Explain the group’s processes and stage of formation.
Explain curative factors that occurred in the group. Include how these factors might impact client progress.
Explain intragroup conflict that occurred and recommend strategies for managing the conflict. Support your recommendations with evidence-based literature
This is the video
Psychotherapy.net (Producer). (2011a). Group therapy: A live demonstration. [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Author .Group Processes and Stages of Formation Essay
Group Processes and Stages of Formation
Group process involves how people and members work together to attain a common objective. Groups are essential for human experiences and hence it is important for the PMHNP to understand group processes and stage formation (Crane-Okada, 2012). This paper will provide a critique for “Group therapy: A live demonstration” video and provide an analysis for the group processes, stage formation, and curative factors of groups. Finally, the paper will discuss the effect of curative factors on client’s progress and strategies to manage intragroup conflict.
Group’s Processes and Stages of Formation
The study of group processes involves social and cognitive effects and their impact on group members. Studies on group process focus on interactions between team members, traits of members, and the effect of such factors on ensuring the efficacy of the group. Group processes consist of essential components like group norms, roles, identity and status of the group, as well as the group social interaction (Crane-Okada, 2012). These components are further influences by qualities such as trust, feedback among group members, and conflict and resolution. Stages of group formation consist of forming, storming, norming, performance stage, as well as adjournment stage (Lerner et al, 2013). Group Processes and Stages of Formation Essay
In the “Group Therapy: A live demonstration” video, the group consisted of individuals struggling with social challenges and hence sought treatment to address these challenges. The common goal of the group was identified by the social challenge all members were experiencing and the need to improve their adaptive functionality; this was the forming stage. The storming phase occurs after forming of the group is typified by role assigning and some disagreements. The norming stage includes the group members normalizing and getting used to each other (Lerner et al, 2013). This was demonstrated in the group where members could share their experiences freely. The performance group is characterized by trust among group members and this was demonstrated in the group where members were able to solve issues with minimal supervision. The group in the video is at the performance stage as the members freely share their experiences and interpersonal relationships (Lerner et al, 2013).
Curative Factors in the Group
Curative factors that took place in the group included hope installation; imparting of information; and universality. Hope installation is evident where group members are ready to provide hope to each other (Hauber et al, 2019). The group members also impart information and universality is also evident. An example of hope installation and imparting of information is evident where for example Gill tells about his alcoholism and shares how alcohol addiction has negatively affected his marriage. Phillip shares about his sexual addiction. After sharing these experiences, group members encourage them and thus install hope (Hauber et al, 2019).
BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Intragroup Conflict that Occurred
An example of an intragroup conflict that occurred in the video is where Philip and Sam sharply differed and argued because of their past encounters. Three strategies that can be used to manage conflicts in a group include collaborating and compromising (Overton & Lowry, 2013). Collaborating includes negotiating between the members having conflict and ensuring members with the conflict learn from each other, compromising strategy include reaching a compromise to ensure all team members find a middle ground (Overton & Lowry, 2013).
Crane-Okada, R. (2012). The concept of presence in group psychotherapy: An operational definition. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 48(3), 156–164.
Hauber K, Boon A & Robert V. (2019). Therapeutic factors that promote recovery in high-risk adolescents intensive group psychotherapeutic MBT programme. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 13(2).
Lerner, M. D., McLeod, B. D., & Mikami, A. Y. (2013). Preliminary evaluation of an observational measure of group cohesion for group psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 69(3).
Overton A & Lowry A. (2013). Conflict Management: Difficult Conversations with Difficult People. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 26(4),259–264.
Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th Edition by Yalom, Irvin D. ; Leszcz, Molyn. Copyright 2005 by Hachette Books Group. Reprinted by permission of Hachette Books Group via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Crane-Okada, R. (2012). The concept of presence in group psychotherapy: An operational definition. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 48(3), 156–164. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6163.2011.00320.x
Lerner, M. D., McLeod, B. D., & Mikami, A. Y. (2013). Preliminary evaluation of an observational measure of group cohesion for group psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(3), 191–208. doi:10.1002/jclp.21933 .Group Processes and Stages of Formation Essay